Angola vs Brazil: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Angola
150.34 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Brazil
143.58 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Angola rank
138th
Brazil rank
139th

Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Angola
  • Brazil
5075100125150196119922023

How they compare

Angola currently reports 150.34 kilograms per year per capita against 143.58 kilograms per year per capita in Brazil, a difference of 6.76 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Angola ahead.

Angola ranks 138th and Brazil ranks 139th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and Brazil in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Brazil Difference Ahead
1960s 81.23 kilograms per year per capita 68.41 kilograms per year per capita 12.82 kilograms per year per capita Angola
1970s 75.77 kilograms per year per capita 74.08 kilograms per year per capita 1.69 kilograms per year per capita Angola
1980s 61.93 kilograms per year per capita 86.62 kilograms per year per capita 24.69 kilograms per year per capita Brazil
1990s 49.11 kilograms per year per capita 99.4 kilograms per year per capita 50.29 kilograms per year per capita Brazil
2000s 67.49 kilograms per year per capita 123.31 kilograms per year per capita 55.82 kilograms per year per capita Brazil
2010s 76.76 kilograms per year per capita 147.92 kilograms per year per capita 71.16 kilograms per year per capita Brazil
2020s 123.79 kilograms per year per capita 140.37 kilograms per year per capita 16.58 kilograms per year per capita Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Angola or Brazil?
Angola, at 150.34 kilograms per year per capita against 143.58 kilograms per year per capita in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Angola and Brazil?
6.76 kilograms per year per capita, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Brazil?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Angola and Brazil rank globally for average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Angola ranks 138th and Brazil ranks 139th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Brazil: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-vegetable-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/angola/brazil/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-vegetable-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/angola/brazil/">Angola vs Brazil: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.