New Zealand vs Tunisia: Average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines
New Zealand
295.76
in 2023
Tunisia
299.7
in 2023
New Zealand rank
53rd
Tunisia rank
52nd
Average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines over time
- New Zealand
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 299.7 against 295.76 in New Zealand, a difference of 3.94.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 53rd and Tunisia ranks 52nd of 191 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 5 and Tunisia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 186.62 | 107.12 | 79.51 | New Zealand |
| 1970s | 195.05 | 116.16 | 78.89 | New Zealand |
| 1980s | 270.38 | 162.21 | 108.17 | New Zealand |
| 1990s | 299.97 | 203.06 | 96.91 | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 315.54 | 235.13 | 80.41 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 217.2 | 255.64 | 38.44 | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 223.19 | 302.68 | 79.49 | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines, New Zealand or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 299.7 against 295.76 in New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines between New Zealand and Tunisia?
- 3.94, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Tunisia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do New Zealand and Tunisia rank globally for average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines?
- New Zealand ranks 53rd and Tunisia ranks 52nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.