Namibia vs Sri Lanka: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Namibia
127.11 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Sri Lanka
117.9 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Namibia rank
155th
Sri Lanka rank
157th

Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Namibia
  • Sri Lanka
100200300196119922023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 127.11 kilograms per year per capita against 117.9 kilograms per year per capita in Sri Lanka, a difference of 9.21 kilograms per year per capita.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Sri Lanka's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Namibia ranks 155th and Sri Lanka ranks 157th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 2 and Sri Lanka in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 85.77 kilograms per year per capita 118.55 kilograms per year per capita 32.78 kilograms per year per capita Sri Lanka
1970s 83.72 kilograms per year per capita 161.7 kilograms per year per capita 77.98 kilograms per year per capita Sri Lanka
1980s 80.49 kilograms per year per capita 173.42 kilograms per year per capita 92.93 kilograms per year per capita Sri Lanka
1990s 74.74 kilograms per year per capita 109.05 kilograms per year per capita 34.31 kilograms per year per capita Sri Lanka
2000s 77.47 kilograms per year per capita 93.67 kilograms per year per capita 16.21 kilograms per year per capita Sri Lanka
2010s 153.9 kilograms per year per capita 100 kilograms per year per capita 53.9 kilograms per year per capita Namibia
2020s 133.34 kilograms per year per capita 127.39 kilograms per year per capita 5.95 kilograms per year per capita Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Namibia or Sri Lanka?
Namibia, at 127.11 kilograms per year per capita against 117.9 kilograms per year per capita in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Namibia and Sri Lanka?
9.21 kilograms per year per capita, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Sri Lanka?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Namibia and Sri Lanka rank globally for average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Namibia ranks 155th and Sri Lanka ranks 157th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Sri Lanka: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/namibia/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/namibia/sri-lanka/">Namibia vs Sri Lanka: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.