Liberia vs Madagascar: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Liberia
99.63 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Madagascar
100.56 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Liberia rank
167th
Madagascar rank
166th

Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Liberia
  • Madagascar
100150200250300196119922023

How they compare

Madagascar currently reports 100.56 kilograms per year per capita against 99.63 kilograms per year per capita in Liberia, a difference of 0.93 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Liberia ahead.

Liberia ranks 167th and Madagascar ranks 166th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Liberia averaged higher in 4 and Madagascar in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Liberia Madagascar Difference Ahead
1960s 177.96 kilograms per year per capita 166.82 kilograms per year per capita 11.13 kilograms per year per capita Liberia
1970s 167.16 kilograms per year per capita 236.44 kilograms per year per capita 69.28 kilograms per year per capita Madagascar
1980s 140.94 kilograms per year per capita 174.59 kilograms per year per capita 33.65 kilograms per year per capita Madagascar
1990s 148.07 kilograms per year per capita 137.32 kilograms per year per capita 10.75 kilograms per year per capita Liberia
2000s 137.48 kilograms per year per capita 120.15 kilograms per year per capita 17.32 kilograms per year per capita Liberia
2010s 112.49 kilograms per year per capita 120.16 kilograms per year per capita 7.66 kilograms per year per capita Madagascar
2020s 103.57 kilograms per year per capita 103.52 kilograms per year per capita 0.0548 kilograms per year per capita Liberia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Liberia or Madagascar?
Madagascar, at 100.56 kilograms per year per capita against 99.63 kilograms per year per capita in Liberia as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Liberia and Madagascar?
0.93 kilograms per year per capita, with Madagascar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Madagascar?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Liberia and Madagascar rank globally for average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Liberia ranks 167th and Madagascar ranks 166th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Liberia vs Madagascar: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/liberia/madagascar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/liberia/madagascar/">Liberia vs Madagascar: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.