Latvia vs Suriname: Average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines
Latvia
171.17
in 2023
Suriname
172.56
in 2023
Latvia rank
131st
Suriname rank
130th
Average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines over time
- Latvia
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 172.56 against 171.17 in Latvia, a difference of 1.39.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Suriname ahead.
Latvia ranks 131st and Suriname ranks 130th of 192 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 116.85 | 235.16 | 118.31 | Suriname |
| 2000s | 151.01 | 195.68 | 44.67 | Suriname |
| 2010s | 139.39 | 237.05 | 97.66 | Suriname |
| 2020s | 175.63 | 197.92 | 22.3 | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines, Latvia or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 172.56 against 171.17 in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines between Latvia and Suriname?
- 1.39, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Suriname?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Suriname rank globally for average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines?
- Latvia ranks 131st and Suriname ranks 130th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.