Jordan vs Zimbabwe: Average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines
Jordan
111.93
in 2023
Zimbabwe
117.85
in 2023
Jordan rank
161st
Zimbabwe rank
158th
Average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines over time
- Jordan
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 117.85 against 111.93 in Jordan, a difference of 5.92.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Jordan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jordan ahead.
Jordan ranks 161st and Zimbabwe ranks 158th of 192 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 6 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 377.99 | 35.73 | 342.27 | Jordan |
| 1970s | 122.99 | 33.13 | 89.86 | Jordan |
| 1980s | 156.91 | 34.4 | 122.51 | Jordan |
| 1990s | 159.37 | 32.97 | 126.4 | Jordan |
| 2000s | 131.76 | 36.67 | 95.09 | Jordan |
| 2010s | 127.12 | 51.52 | 75.6 | Jordan |
| 2020s | 99.32 | 110.67 | 11.34 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines, Jordan or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 117.85 against 111.93 in Jordan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines between Jordan and Zimbabwe?
- 5.92, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Zimbabwe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Jordan and Zimbabwe rank globally for average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines?
- Jordan ranks 161st and Zimbabwe ranks 158th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.