Japan vs Namibia: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Japan
122.51 kilograms per year per capita
in 2022
Namibia
127.11 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Japan rank
156th
Namibia rank
155th

Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Japan
  • Namibia
50100150200196119922023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 127.11 kilograms per year per capita against 122.51 kilograms per year per capita in Japan, a difference of 4.6 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Namibia ahead.

Japan ranks 156th and Namibia ranks 155th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 5 and Namibia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 106.86 kilograms per year per capita 85.77 kilograms per year per capita 21.08 kilograms per year per capita Japan
1970s 158.13 kilograms per year per capita 83.72 kilograms per year per capita 74.41 kilograms per year per capita Japan
1980s 143.84 kilograms per year per capita 80.49 kilograms per year per capita 63.36 kilograms per year per capita Japan
1990s 137.92 kilograms per year per capita 74.74 kilograms per year per capita 63.18 kilograms per year per capita Japan
2000s 150.86 kilograms per year per capita 77.47 kilograms per year per capita 73.4 kilograms per year per capita Japan
2010s 131.4 kilograms per year per capita 153.9 kilograms per year per capita 22.51 kilograms per year per capita Namibia
2020s 123 kilograms per year per capita 135.41 kilograms per year per capita 12.41 kilograms per year per capita Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Japan or Namibia?
Namibia, at 127.11 kilograms per year per capita against 122.51 kilograms per year per capita in Japan as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Japan and Namibia?
4.6 kilograms per year per capita, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Namibia?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Japan and Namibia rank globally for average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Japan ranks 156th and Namibia ranks 155th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Japan vs Namibia: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/japan/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/japan/namibia/">Japan vs Namibia: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.