Japan vs Namibia: Average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines
Japan
122.51
in 2022
Namibia
127.11
in 2023
Japan rank
156th
Namibia rank
155th
Average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines over time
- Japan
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 127.11 against 122.51 in Japan, a difference of 4.6.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Namibia ahead.
Japan ranks 156th and Namibia ranks 155th of 192 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 5 and Namibia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 106.86 | 85.77 | 21.08 | Japan |
| 1970s | 158.13 | 83.72 | 74.41 | Japan |
| 1980s | 143.84 | 80.49 | 63.36 | Japan |
| 1990s | 137.92 | 74.74 | 63.18 | Japan |
| 2000s | 150.86 | 77.47 | 73.4 | Japan |
| 2010s | 131.4 | 153.9 | 22.51 | Namibia |
| 2020s | 123 | 135.41 | 12.41 | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines, Japan or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 127.11 against 122.51 in Japan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines between Japan and Namibia?
- 4.6, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Namibia?
- 62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
- How do Japan and Namibia rank globally for average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines?
- Japan ranks 156th and Namibia ranks 155th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.