Guatemala vs Nigeria: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Guatemala
191.12 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Nigeria
187.06 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Guatemala rank
120th
Nigeria rank
123rd

Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Guatemala
  • Nigeria
100150200250300196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 191.12 kilograms per year per capita against 187.06 kilograms per year per capita in Nigeria, a difference of 4.06 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nigeria ahead.

Guatemala ranks 120th and Nigeria ranks 123rd of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 2 and Nigeria in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Nigeria Difference Ahead
1960s 103.46 kilograms per year per capita 174.2 kilograms per year per capita 70.73 kilograms per year per capita Nigeria
1970s 95.15 kilograms per year per capita 181.96 kilograms per year per capita 86.81 kilograms per year per capita Nigeria
1980s 120.51 kilograms per year per capita 166.58 kilograms per year per capita 46.07 kilograms per year per capita Nigeria
1990s 163.91 kilograms per year per capita 175.73 kilograms per year per capita 11.82 kilograms per year per capita Nigeria
2000s 172.17 kilograms per year per capita 173.9 kilograms per year per capita 1.73 kilograms per year per capita Nigeria
2010s 153.71 kilograms per year per capita 152.64 kilograms per year per capita 1.08 kilograms per year per capita Guatemala
2020s 245.47 kilograms per year per capita 181 kilograms per year per capita 64.47 kilograms per year per capita Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Guatemala or Nigeria?
Guatemala, at 191.12 kilograms per year per capita against 187.06 kilograms per year per capita in Nigeria as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Guatemala and Nigeria?
4.06 kilograms per year per capita, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Nigeria?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Nigeria rank globally for average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Guatemala ranks 120th and Nigeria ranks 123rd of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Nigeria: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/guatemala/nigeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/guatemala/nigeria/">Guatemala vs Nigeria: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.