Grenada vs Netherlands: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Grenada
438.87 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Netherlands
432.65 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Grenada rank
18th
Netherlands rank
20th

Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Grenada
  • Netherlands
200300400500600196119922023

How they compare

Grenada currently reports 438.87 kilograms per year per capita against 432.65 kilograms per year per capita in Netherlands, a difference of 6.22 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Grenada ahead.

Grenada ranks 18th and Netherlands ranks 20th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Grenada averaged higher in 5 and Netherlands in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Grenada Netherlands Difference Ahead
1960s 370.18 kilograms per year per capita 211.93 kilograms per year per capita 158.25 kilograms per year per capita Grenada
1970s 366.34 kilograms per year per capita 245.74 kilograms per year per capita 120.6 kilograms per year per capita Grenada
1980s 375.48 kilograms per year per capita 295.56 kilograms per year per capita 79.91 kilograms per year per capita Grenada
1990s 439.36 kilograms per year per capita 360.09 kilograms per year per capita 79.27 kilograms per year per capita Grenada
2000s 393.07 kilograms per year per capita 346.24 kilograms per year per capita 46.83 kilograms per year per capita Grenada
2010s 441.59 kilograms per year per capita 494.18 kilograms per year per capita 52.59 kilograms per year per capita Netherlands
2020s 434.93 kilograms per year per capita 446.67 kilograms per year per capita 11.74 kilograms per year per capita Netherlands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Grenada or Netherlands?
Grenada, at 438.87 kilograms per year per capita against 432.65 kilograms per year per capita in Netherlands as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Grenada and Netherlands?
6.22 kilograms per year per capita, with Grenada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Netherlands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Grenada and Netherlands rank globally for average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Grenada ranks 18th and Netherlands ranks 20th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Grenada vs Netherlands: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/grenada/netherlands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/grenada/netherlands/">Grenada vs Netherlands: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.