Congo vs Sri Lanka: Average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines
Congo
114.26
in 2023
Sri Lanka
117.9
in 2023
Congo rank
160th
Sri Lanka rank
157th
Average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines over time
- Congo
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 117.9 against 114.26 in Congo, a difference of 3.64.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 160th and Sri Lanka ranks 157th of 192 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 4 and Sri Lanka in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 122.54 | 118.55 | 3.99 | Congo |
| 1970s | 127.27 | 161.7 | 34.43 | Sri Lanka |
| 1980s | 144.47 | 173.42 | 28.95 | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 161.62 | 109.05 | 52.57 | Congo |
| 2000s | 160.17 | 93.67 | 66.5 | Congo |
| 2010s | 134.64 | 100 | 34.64 | Congo |
| 2020s | 117.97 | 127.39 | 9.42 | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines, Congo or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 117.9 against 114.26 in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines between Congo and Sri Lanka?
- 3.64, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Sri Lanka?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Sri Lanka rank globally for average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines?
- Congo ranks 160th and Sri Lanka ranks 157th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.