Congo vs Sri Lanka: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Congo
114.26 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Sri Lanka
117.9 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Congo rank
160th
Sri Lanka rank
157th

Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Congo
  • Sri Lanka
100200300196119922023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 117.9 kilograms per year per capita against 114.26 kilograms per year per capita in Congo, a difference of 3.64 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 160th and Sri Lanka ranks 157th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 4 and Sri Lanka in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 122.54 kilograms per year per capita 118.55 kilograms per year per capita 3.99 kilograms per year per capita Congo
1970s 127.27 kilograms per year per capita 161.7 kilograms per year per capita 34.43 kilograms per year per capita Sri Lanka
1980s 144.47 kilograms per year per capita 173.42 kilograms per year per capita 28.95 kilograms per year per capita Sri Lanka
1990s 161.62 kilograms per year per capita 109.05 kilograms per year per capita 52.57 kilograms per year per capita Congo
2000s 160.17 kilograms per year per capita 93.67 kilograms per year per capita 66.5 kilograms per year per capita Congo
2010s 134.64 kilograms per year per capita 100 kilograms per year per capita 34.64 kilograms per year per capita Congo
2020s 117.97 kilograms per year per capita 127.39 kilograms per year per capita 9.42 kilograms per year per capita Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Congo or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 117.9 kilograms per year per capita against 114.26 kilograms per year per capita in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Congo and Sri Lanka?
3.64 kilograms per year per capita, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Sri Lanka?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Sri Lanka rank globally for average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Congo ranks 160th and Sri Lanka ranks 157th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Sri Lanka: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/congo-rep/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/congo-rep/sri-lanka/">Congo vs Sri Lanka: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.