Chile vs Hong Kong: Average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines
Chile
210.46
in 2023
Hong Kong
205.69
in 2023
Chile rank
109th
Hong Kong rank
112th
Average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines over time
- Chile
- Hong Kong
How they compare
Chile currently reports 210.46 against 205.69 in Hong Kong, a difference of 4.77.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 109th and Hong Kong ranks 112th of 192 countries.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Hong Kong | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 105.98 | 139.83 | 33.84 | Hong Kong |
| 1970s | 109.71 | 196.59 | 86.88 | Hong Kong |
| 1980s | 110.28 | 208.33 | 98.04 | Hong Kong |
| 1990s | 148.55 | 240.69 | 92.14 | Hong Kong |
| 2000s | 155.72 | 235.1 | 79.38 | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 191.95 | 232.78 | 40.83 | Hong Kong |
| 2020s | 182.12 | 210.37 | 28.25 | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines, Chile or Hong Kong?
- Chile, at 210.46 against 205.69 in Hong Kong as of 2023.
- What is the difference in average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines between Chile and Hong Kong?
- 4.77, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Hong Kong?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Hong Kong rank globally for average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines?
- Chile ranks 109th and Hong Kong ranks 112th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.