Chile vs Cyprus: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Chile
210.46 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Cyprus
213.14 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Chile rank
109th
Cyprus rank
106th

Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Chile
  • Cyprus
0200400600196119922023

How they compare

Cyprus currently reports 213.14 kilograms per year per capita against 210.46 kilograms per year per capita in Chile, a difference of 2.68 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cyprus ahead.

Chile ranks 109th and Cyprus ranks 106th of 192 countries.

Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Cyprus Difference Ahead
1960s 105.98 kilograms per year per capita 396.27 kilograms per year per capita 290.29 kilograms per year per capita Cyprus
1970s 109.71 kilograms per year per capita 483.59 kilograms per year per capita 373.88 kilograms per year per capita Cyprus
1980s 110.28 kilograms per year per capita 460.39 kilograms per year per capita 350.1 kilograms per year per capita Cyprus
1990s 148.55 kilograms per year per capita 312.51 kilograms per year per capita 163.96 kilograms per year per capita Cyprus
2000s 155.72 kilograms per year per capita 267.85 kilograms per year per capita 112.13 kilograms per year per capita Cyprus
2010s 191.95 kilograms per year per capita 215.68 kilograms per year per capita 23.73 kilograms per year per capita Cyprus
2020s 182.12 kilograms per year per capita 232.53 kilograms per year per capita 50.41 kilograms per year per capita Cyprus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Chile or Cyprus?
Cyprus, at 213.14 kilograms per year per capita against 210.46 kilograms per year per capita in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Chile and Cyprus?
2.68 kilograms per year per capita, with Cyprus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Cyprus?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Cyprus rank globally for average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Chile ranks 109th and Cyprus ranks 106th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Cyprus: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/chile/cyprus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/chile/cyprus/">Chile vs Cyprus: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.