Cameroon vs Finland: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Cameroon
255.64 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Finland
252.55 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Cameroon rank
79th
Finland rank
81st

Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Cameroon
  • Finland
100200300400196119922023

How they compare

Cameroon currently reports 255.64 kilograms per year per capita against 252.55 kilograms per year per capita in Finland, a difference of 3.09 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cameroon ahead.

Cameroon ranks 79th and Finland ranks 81st of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 6 and Finland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon Finland Difference Ahead
1960s 256.15 kilograms per year per capita 124.33 kilograms per year per capita 131.82 kilograms per year per capita Cameroon
1970s 315.45 kilograms per year per capita 190.78 kilograms per year per capita 124.67 kilograms per year per capita Cameroon
1980s 380.86 kilograms per year per capita 210.98 kilograms per year per capita 169.88 kilograms per year per capita Cameroon
1990s 318.63 kilograms per year per capita 201.99 kilograms per year per capita 116.64 kilograms per year per capita Cameroon
2000s 249.67 kilograms per year per capita 246.42 kilograms per year per capita 3.25 kilograms per year per capita Cameroon
2010s 312.26 kilograms per year per capita 298.3 kilograms per year per capita 13.96 kilograms per year per capita Cameroon
2020s 268.2 kilograms per year per capita 277.48 kilograms per year per capita 9.28 kilograms per year per capita Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Cameroon or Finland?
Cameroon, at 255.64 kilograms per year per capita against 252.55 kilograms per year per capita in Finland as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Cameroon and Finland?
3.09 kilograms per year per capita, with Cameroon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Finland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cameroon and Finland rank globally for average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Cameroon ranks 79th and Finland ranks 81st of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cameroon vs Finland: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/cameroon/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/cameroon/finland/">Cameroon vs Finland: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.