Botswana vs Namibia: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Botswana
127.79 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Namibia
127.11 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Botswana rank
153rd
Namibia rank
155th

Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Botswana
  • Namibia
50100150200196119922023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 127.79 kilograms per year per capita against 127.11 kilograms per year per capita in Namibia, a difference of 0.68 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Namibia ahead.

Botswana ranks 153rd and Namibia ranks 155th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 33.84 kilograms per year per capita 85.77 kilograms per year per capita 51.93 kilograms per year per capita Namibia
1970s 38.98 kilograms per year per capita 83.72 kilograms per year per capita 44.73 kilograms per year per capita Namibia
1980s 46.26 kilograms per year per capita 80.49 kilograms per year per capita 34.23 kilograms per year per capita Namibia
1990s 117 kilograms per year per capita 74.74 kilograms per year per capita 42.26 kilograms per year per capita Botswana
2000s 138.55 kilograms per year per capita 77.47 kilograms per year per capita 61.09 kilograms per year per capita Botswana
2010s 85.08 kilograms per year per capita 153.9 kilograms per year per capita 68.82 kilograms per year per capita Namibia
2020s 122.85 kilograms per year per capita 133.34 kilograms per year per capita 10.49 kilograms per year per capita Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Botswana or Namibia?
Botswana, at 127.79 kilograms per year per capita against 127.11 kilograms per year per capita in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Botswana and Namibia?
0.68 kilograms per year per capita, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Namibia rank globally for average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Botswana ranks 153rd and Namibia ranks 155th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Namibia: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/botswana/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/botswana/namibia/">Botswana vs Namibia: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.