Botswana vs Guinea-Bissau: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Botswana
127.79 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau
127.22 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Botswana rank
153rd
Guinea-Bissau rank
154th

Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Botswana
  • Guinea-Bissau
50100150200196119922023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 127.79 kilograms per year per capita against 127.22 kilograms per year per capita in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.57 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Botswana ranks 153rd and Guinea-Bissau ranks 154th of 192 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1960s 33.84 kilograms per year per capita 137.13 kilograms per year per capita 103.29 kilograms per year per capita Guinea-Bissau
1970s 38.98 kilograms per year per capita 136.76 kilograms per year per capita 97.78 kilograms per year per capita Guinea-Bissau
1980s 46.26 kilograms per year per capita 127.45 kilograms per year per capita 81.19 kilograms per year per capita Guinea-Bissau
1990s 117 kilograms per year per capita 150.45 kilograms per year per capita 33.45 kilograms per year per capita Guinea-Bissau
2000s 138.55 kilograms per year per capita 144.91 kilograms per year per capita 6.36 kilograms per year per capita Guinea-Bissau
2010s 85.08 kilograms per year per capita 141.39 kilograms per year per capita 56.31 kilograms per year per capita Guinea-Bissau
2020s 122.85 kilograms per year per capita 133.91 kilograms per year per capita 11.06 kilograms per year per capita Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Botswana or Guinea-Bissau?
Botswana, at 127.79 kilograms per year per capita against 127.22 kilograms per year per capita in Guinea-Bissau as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Botswana and Guinea-Bissau?
0.57 kilograms per year per capita, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Guinea-Bissau?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Botswana ranks 153rd and Guinea-Bissau ranks 154th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Guinea-Bissau: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/botswana/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/botswana/guinea-bissau/">Botswana vs Guinea-Bissau: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.