Bhutan vs Sierra Leone: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Bhutan
84.58 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Sierra Leone
84.25 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Bhutan rank
171st
Sierra Leone rank
172nd
Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time
- Bhutan
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 84.58 kilograms per year per capita against 84.25 kilograms per year per capita in Sierra Leone, a difference of 0.33 kilograms per year per capita.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Sierra Leone ahead.
Bhutan ranks 171st and Sierra Leone ranks 172nd of 192 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 1 and Sierra Leone in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 69.13 kilograms per year per capita | 88.09 kilograms per year per capita | 18.96 kilograms per year per capita | Sierra Leone |
| 2020s | 94.23 kilograms per year per capita | 86.5 kilograms per year per capita | 7.73 kilograms per year per capita | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Bhutan or Sierra Leone?
- Bhutan, at 84.58 kilograms per year per capita against 84.25 kilograms per year per capita in Sierra Leone as of 2023.
- What is the difference in average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Bhutan and Sierra Leone?
- 0.33 kilograms per year per capita, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Sierra Leone?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Bhutan and Sierra Leone rank globally for average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
- Bhutan ranks 171st and Sierra Leone ranks 172nd of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.