Barbados vs Rwanda: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Barbados
282.65 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Rwanda
272.11 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Barbados rank
64th
Rwanda rank
66th

Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Barbados
  • Rwanda
02505007501.0k1.2k196119922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 282.65 kilograms per year per capita against 272.11 kilograms per year per capita in Rwanda, a difference of 10.54 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.

Barbados ranks 64th and Rwanda ranks 66th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 117.4 kilograms per year per capita 1,019 kilograms per year per capita 901.61 kilograms per year per capita Rwanda
1970s 143.71 kilograms per year per capita 1,083 kilograms per year per capita 939.43 kilograms per year per capita Rwanda
1980s 195 kilograms per year per capita 1,057 kilograms per year per capita 861.59 kilograms per year per capita Rwanda
1990s 223.12 kilograms per year per capita 860.64 kilograms per year per capita 637.52 kilograms per year per capita Rwanda
2000s 313.71 kilograms per year per capita 806.43 kilograms per year per capita 492.72 kilograms per year per capita Rwanda
2010s 303.09 kilograms per year per capita 339.55 kilograms per year per capita 36.46 kilograms per year per capita Rwanda
2020s 294.55 kilograms per year per capita 265.55 kilograms per year per capita 29 kilograms per year per capita Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Barbados or Rwanda?
Barbados, at 282.65 kilograms per year per capita against 272.11 kilograms per year per capita in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Barbados and Rwanda?
10.54 kilograms per year per capita, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Rwanda rank globally for average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Barbados ranks 64th and Rwanda ranks 66th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Rwanda: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/barbados/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/barbados/rwanda/">Barbados vs Rwanda: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.