Bahamas vs Uganda: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Bahamas
849.02 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Uganda
568.85 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Bahamas rank
4th
Uganda rank
7th

Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Bahamas
  • Uganda
200400600800196119922023

How they compare

Bahamas currently reports 849.02 kilograms per year per capita against 568.85 kilograms per year per capita in Uganda, a difference of 280.17 kilograms per year per capita.

That makes Bahamas's figure about 1.5 times Uganda's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uganda ahead.

Bahamas ranks 4th and Uganda ranks 7th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 3 and Uganda in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 204.61 kilograms per year per capita 366.22 kilograms per year per capita 161.61 kilograms per year per capita Uganda
1970s 227.54 kilograms per year per capita 360.91 kilograms per year per capita 133.37 kilograms per year per capita Uganda
1980s 311.76 kilograms per year per capita 519.48 kilograms per year per capita 207.72 kilograms per year per capita Uganda
1990s 370.91 kilograms per year per capita 573.89 kilograms per year per capita 202.98 kilograms per year per capita Uganda
2000s 666.84 kilograms per year per capita 486.33 kilograms per year per capita 180.51 kilograms per year per capita Bahamas
2010s 656.95 kilograms per year per capita 362.01 kilograms per year per capita 294.94 kilograms per year per capita Bahamas
2020s 687.27 kilograms per year per capita 598.59 kilograms per year per capita 88.68 kilograms per year per capita Bahamas

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Bahamas or Uganda?
Bahamas, at 849.02 kilograms per year per capita against 568.85 kilograms per year per capita in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Bahamas and Uganda?
280.17 kilograms per year per capita, with Bahamas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Uganda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bahamas and Uganda rank globally for average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Bahamas ranks 4th and Uganda ranks 7th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Uganda: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/bahamas-the/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/bahamas-the/uganda/">Bahamas vs Uganda: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.