Austria vs China: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Austria
321.21 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
China
313.35 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Austria rank
43rd
China rank
45th

Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Austria
  • China
0100200300400500196119922023

How they compare

Austria currently reports 321.21 kilograms per year per capita against 313.35 kilograms per year per capita in China, a difference of 7.86 kilograms per year per capita.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Austria has been ahead every year.

Austria ranks 43rd and China ranks 45th of 192 countries.

Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria China Difference Ahead
1960s 325.17 kilograms per year per capita 10.74 kilograms per year per capita 314.43 kilograms per year per capita Austria
1970s 311.48 kilograms per year per capita 13.64 kilograms per year per capita 297.84 kilograms per year per capita Austria
1980s 346.87 kilograms per year per capita 26.1 kilograms per year per capita 320.77 kilograms per year per capita Austria
1990s 352.59 kilograms per year per capita 75.61 kilograms per year per capita 276.97 kilograms per year per capita Austria
2000s 379.76 kilograms per year per capita 156.03 kilograms per year per capita 223.72 kilograms per year per capita Austria
2010s 317.96 kilograms per year per capita 249.72 kilograms per year per capita 68.24 kilograms per year per capita Austria
2020s 324.98 kilograms per year per capita 300.94 kilograms per year per capita 24.04 kilograms per year per capita Austria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Austria or China?
Austria, at 321.21 kilograms per year per capita against 313.35 kilograms per year per capita in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Austria and China?
7.86 kilograms per year per capita, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and China?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Austria and China rank globally for average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Austria ranks 43rd and China ranks 45th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs China: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/austria/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/austria/china/">Austria vs China: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.