Australia vs Indonesia: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Australia
235.86 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Indonesia
233.94 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Australia rank
90th
Indonesia rank
91st

Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Australia
  • Indonesia
50100150200250300196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 235.86 kilograms per year per capita against 233.94 kilograms per year per capita in Indonesia, a difference of 1.92 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 90th and Indonesia ranks 91st of 192 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Indonesia Difference Ahead
1960s 223.52 kilograms per year per capita 63.03 kilograms per year per capita 160.49 kilograms per year per capita Australia
1970s 234.97 kilograms per year per capita 68.99 kilograms per year per capita 165.98 kilograms per year per capita Australia
1980s 237.75 kilograms per year per capita 74.07 kilograms per year per capita 163.68 kilograms per year per capita Australia
1990s 240.96 kilograms per year per capita 84.79 kilograms per year per capita 156.17 kilograms per year per capita Australia
2000s 277.03 kilograms per year per capita 146.61 kilograms per year per capita 130.43 kilograms per year per capita Australia
2010s 243.64 kilograms per year per capita 171.32 kilograms per year per capita 72.31 kilograms per year per capita Australia
2020s 223.1 kilograms per year per capita 220.86 kilograms per year per capita 2.24 kilograms per year per capita Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Australia or Indonesia?
Australia, at 235.86 kilograms per year per capita against 233.94 kilograms per year per capita in Indonesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Australia and Indonesia?
1.92 kilograms per year per capita, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Indonesia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Indonesia rank globally for average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Australia ranks 90th and Indonesia ranks 91st of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Indonesia: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/australia/indonesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/australia/indonesia/">Australia vs Indonesia: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.