Oman vs Tokelau: Wildfire area burned by land cover type
Oman
0 hectares
in 2024
Tokelau
0 hectares
in 2024
Oman rank
100th
Tokelau rank
100th
Wildfire area burned by land cover type over time
- Oman
- Tokelau
How they compare
Oman currently reports 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Tokelau, a difference of 0 hectares.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Tokelau has been ahead every year.
Oman ranks 100th and Tokelau ranks 100th of 225 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oman | Tokelau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | — |
| 2010s | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | — |
| 2020s | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wildfire area burned by land cover type, Oman or Tokelau?
- Oman, at 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Tokelau as of 2024.
- What is the difference in wildfire area burned by land cover type between Oman and Tokelau?
- 0 hectares, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Tokelau?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Oman and Tokelau rank globally for wildfire area burned by land cover type?
- Oman ranks 100th and Tokelau ranks 100th of 225 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Wildfire Information System (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Wildfire area burned by land cover type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Area of other land types burnt by wildfires each year, in hectares. Includes wetlands, urban areas, snow and ice, bare ground, and water bodies.