Namibia vs Uzbekistan: Wildfire area burned by land cover type
Namibia
0 hectares
in 2025
Uzbekistan
0 hectares
in 2025
Namibia rank
99th
Uzbekistan rank
99th
Wildfire area burned by land cover type over time
- Namibia
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0 hectares.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Namibia ahead.
Namibia ranks 99th and Uzbekistan ranks 99th of 225 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 134.16 hectares | 262.96 hectares | 128.8 hectares | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 88.01 hectares | 841.46 hectares | 753.45 hectares | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 21.47 hectares | 1,030 hectares | 1,009 hectares | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wildfire area burned by land cover type, Namibia or Uzbekistan?
- Namibia, at 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Uzbekistan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in wildfire area burned by land cover type between Namibia and Uzbekistan?
- 0 hectares, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Uzbekistan?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2025.
- How do Namibia and Uzbekistan rank globally for wildfire area burned by land cover type?
- Namibia ranks 99th and Uzbekistan ranks 99th of 225 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Wildfire Information System (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Wildfire area burned by land cover type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Area of other land types burnt by wildfires each year, in hectares. Includes wetlands, urban areas, snow and ice, bare ground, and water bodies.