Malta vs Nepal: Wildfire area burned by land cover type
Malta
0 hectares
in 2024
Nepal
0 hectares
in 2024
Malta rank
100th
Nepal rank
100th
Wildfire area burned by land cover type over time
- Malta
- Nepal
How they compare
Malta currently reports 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Nepal, a difference of 0 hectares.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.
Malta ranks 100th and Nepal ranks 100th of 225 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | — |
| 2010s | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | — |
| 2020s | 0 hectares | 17.17 hectares | 17.17 hectares | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wildfire area burned by land cover type, Malta or Nepal?
- Malta, at 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Nepal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in wildfire area burned by land cover type between Malta and Nepal?
- 0 hectares, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Nepal?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Malta and Nepal rank globally for wildfire area burned by land cover type?
- Malta ranks 100th and Nepal ranks 100th of 225 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Wildfire Information System (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Wildfire area burned by land cover type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Area of other land types burnt by wildfires each year, in hectares. Includes wetlands, urban areas, snow and ice, bare ground, and water bodies.