Hong Kong vs Namibia: Wildfire area burned by land cover type
Hong Kong
0 hectares
in 2025
Namibia
0 hectares
in 2025
Hong Kong rank
99th
Namibia rank
99th
Wildfire area burned by land cover type over time
- Hong Kong
- Namibia
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Namibia, a difference of 0 hectares.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Namibia ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 99th and Namibia ranks 99th of 225 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40.25 hectares | 134.16 hectares | 93.91 hectares | Namibia |
| 2010s | 2.15 hectares | 88.01 hectares | 85.86 hectares | Namibia |
| 2020s | 0 hectares | 21.47 hectares | 21.47 hectares | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wildfire area burned by land cover type, Hong Kong or Namibia?
- Hong Kong, at 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Namibia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in wildfire area burned by land cover type between Hong Kong and Namibia?
- 0 hectares, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Namibia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2025.
- How do Hong Kong and Namibia rank globally for wildfire area burned by land cover type?
- Hong Kong ranks 99th and Namibia ranks 99th of 225 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Wildfire Information System (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Wildfire area burned by land cover type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Area of other land types burnt by wildfires each year, in hectares. Includes wetlands, urban areas, snow and ice, bare ground, and water bodies.