Hong Kong vs Israel: Wildfire area burned by land cover type
Hong Kong
0 hectares
in 2025
Israel
0 hectares
in 2025
Hong Kong rank
99th
Israel rank
99th
Wildfire area burned by land cover type over time
- Hong Kong
- Israel
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Israel, a difference of 0 hectares.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Israel ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 99th and Israel ranks 99th of 225 countries.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40.25 hectares | 5.37 hectares | 34.88 hectares | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 2.15 hectares | 0 hectares | 2.15 hectares | Hong Kong |
| 2020s | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wildfire area burned by land cover type, Hong Kong or Israel?
- Hong Kong, at 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Israel as of 2025.
- What is the difference in wildfire area burned by land cover type between Hong Kong and Israel?
- 0 hectares, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Israel?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2025.
- How do Hong Kong and Israel rank globally for wildfire area burned by land cover type?
- Hong Kong ranks 99th and Israel ranks 99th of 225 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Wildfire Information System (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Wildfire area burned by land cover type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Area of other land types burnt by wildfires each year, in hectares. Includes wetlands, urban areas, snow and ice, bare ground, and water bodies.