Grenada vs Namibia: Wildfire area burned by land cover type
Grenada
0 hectares
in 2025
Namibia
0 hectares
in 2025
Grenada rank
99th
Namibia rank
99th
Wildfire area burned by land cover type over time
- Grenada
- Namibia
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Namibia, a difference of 0 hectares.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Grenada ranks 99th and Namibia ranks 99th of 225 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares | 134.16 hectares | 134.16 hectares | Namibia |
| 2010s | 8.59 hectares | 88.01 hectares | 79.42 hectares | Namibia |
| 2020s | 10.73 hectares | 21.47 hectares | 10.73 hectares | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wildfire area burned by land cover type, Grenada or Namibia?
- Grenada, at 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Namibia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in wildfire area burned by land cover type between Grenada and Namibia?
- 0 hectares, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Namibia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2025.
- How do Grenada and Namibia rank globally for wildfire area burned by land cover type?
- Grenada ranks 99th and Namibia ranks 99th of 225 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Wildfire Information System (2026) β with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Wildfire area burned by land cover type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Area of other land types burnt by wildfires each year, in hectares. Includes wetlands, urban areas, snow and ice, bare ground, and water bodies.