Fiji vs Nepal: Wildfire area burned by land cover type
Fiji
0 hectares
in 2024
Nepal
0 hectares
in 2024
Fiji rank
100th
Nepal rank
100th
Wildfire area burned by land cover type over time
- Fiji
- Nepal
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Nepal, a difference of 0 hectares.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Nepal ahead.
Fiji ranks 100th and Nepal ranks 100th of 225 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 2 and Nepal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.05 hectares | 0 hectares | 8.05 hectares | Fiji |
| 2010s | 62.25 hectares | 0 hectares | 62.25 hectares | Fiji |
| 2020s | 4.29 hectares | 17.17 hectares | 12.88 hectares | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wildfire area burned by land cover type, Fiji or Nepal?
- Fiji, at 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Nepal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in wildfire area burned by land cover type between Fiji and Nepal?
- 0 hectares, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Nepal?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Fiji and Nepal rank globally for wildfire area burned by land cover type?
- Fiji ranks 100th and Nepal ranks 100th of 225 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Wildfire Information System (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Wildfire area burned by land cover type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Area of other land types burnt by wildfires each year, in hectares. Includes wetlands, urban areas, snow and ice, bare ground, and water bodies.