Bermuda vs Eswatini: Wildfire area burned by land cover type
Bermuda
0 hectares
in 2024
Eswatini
0 hectares
in 2024
Bermuda rank
100th
Eswatini rank
100th
Wildfire area burned by land cover type over time
- Bermuda
- Eswatini
How they compare
Bermuda currently reports 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Eswatini, a difference of 0 hectares.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.
Bermuda ranks 100th and Eswatini ranks 100th of 225 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bermuda | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares | 8.05 hectares | 8.05 hectares | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 0 hectares | 8.59 hectares | 8.59 hectares | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0 hectares | 4.29 hectares | 4.29 hectares | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wildfire area burned by land cover type, Bermuda or Eswatini?
- Bermuda, at 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in wildfire area burned by land cover type between Bermuda and Eswatini?
- 0 hectares, with Bermuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bermuda and Eswatini?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Bermuda and Eswatini rank globally for wildfire area burned by land cover type?
- Bermuda ranks 100th and Eswatini ranks 100th of 225 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Wildfire Information System (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Wildfire area burned by land cover type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Area of other land types burnt by wildfires each year, in hectares. Includes wetlands, urban areas, snow and ice, bare ground, and water bodies.