Czechia vs Viet Nam: All staff compensation as % of total expenditure in lower secondary
All staff compensation as % of total expenditure in lower secondary over time
- Czechia
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 58.6% against 56.0% in Czechia, a difference of 2.6%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Viet Nam ahead.
Czechia ranks 80th and Viet Nam ranks 77th of 85 countries.
Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 57.1% | 58.5% | 1.4% | Viet Nam |
| 2010s | 55.3% | 56.2% | 0.9% | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher all staff compensation as % of total expenditure in lower secondary, Czechia or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 58.6% against 56.0% in Czechia as of 2013.
- What is the difference in all staff compensation as % of total expenditure in lower secondary between Czechia and Viet Nam?
- 2.6%, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Viet Nam?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2013.
- How do Czechia and Viet Nam rank globally for all staff compensation as % of total expenditure in lower secondary?
- Czechia ranks 80th and Viet Nam ranks 77th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as All staff compensation as % of total expenditure in lower secondary public institutions (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
All staff (teacher and non-teachers) compensation expressed as a percentage of direct expenditure in public educational institutions (instructional and non-instructional) of the specified level of education. Financial aid to students and other transfers are excluded from direct expenditure. Staff compensation includes salaries, contributions by employers for staff retirement programmes, and other allowances and benefits. Divide all staff compensation in public institutions of a given level of education (ex. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) by total expenditure (current and capital) in public institutions of the same level of education, and multiply by 100. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/