Afghanistan vs Zimbabwe: Total dependency ratio

Afghanistan
83.8%
in 2023
Zimbabwe
81.6%
in 2023
Afghanistan rank
16th
Zimbabwe rank
18th

Total dependency ratio over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Zimbabwe
0255075100195019862023

How they compare

Afghanistan currently reports 83.8% against 81.6% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 2.2%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 74 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 16th and Zimbabwe ranks 18th of 236 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1950s 79.3% 94.4% 15.1% Zimbabwe
1960s 83.2% 106.8% 23.6% Zimbabwe
1970s 90.6% 106.4% 15.8% Zimbabwe
1980s 97.0% 105.3% 8.4% Zimbabwe
1990s 103.8% 95.4% 8.4% Afghanistan
2000s 108.9% 82.4% 26.5% Afghanistan
2010s 95.6% 87.5% 8.1% Afghanistan
2020s 85.5% 83.0% 2.5% Afghanistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total dependency ratio, Afghanistan or Zimbabwe?
Afghanistan, at 83.8% against 81.6% in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in total dependency ratio between Afghanistan and Zimbabwe?
2.2%, with Afghanistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Zimbabwe?
74 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2023.
How do Afghanistan and Zimbabwe rank globally for total dependency ratio?
Afghanistan ranks 16th and Zimbabwe ranks 18th of 236 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UN, World Population Prospects (2024) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Total dependency ratio. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Total dependency ratio
Unit
%
Source
UN, World Population Prospects (2024) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
236 places, 17,464 data points, 1950–2023
Last refreshed

The number of children (under 15) and people aged 65 and over per 100 working-age people (aged 15 to 64).