Belarus vs Poland: Adequacy of social insurance programs

Belarus
64.6%
in 2019
Poland
86.9%
in 2019
Belarus rank
4th
Poland rank
3rd

Adequacy of social insurance programs over time

  • Belarus
  • Poland
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Poland currently reports 86.9% against 64.6% in Belarus, a difference of 22.3%.

That makes Poland's figure about 1.3 times Belarus's.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 4th and Poland ranks 3rd of 32 countries.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Poland Difference Ahead
2000s 53.1% 69.5% 16.4% Poland
2010s 59.9% 75.8% 15.9% Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adequacy of social insurance programs, Belarus or Poland?
Poland, at 86.9% against 64.6% in Belarus as of 2019.
What is the difference in adequacy of social insurance programs between Belarus and Poland?
22.3%, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Poland?
8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
How do Belarus and Poland rank globally for adequacy of social insurance programs?
Belarus ranks 4th and Poland ranks 3rd of 32 countries.
Where does this data come from?
ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection, World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Adequacy of social insurance programs. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of social insurance programs
Unit
% of total welfare of beneficiary households
Source
ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection, World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
32 places, 337 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Adequacy of social insurance programs is measured as the total transfer amount received by those participating in social insurance programs as a share of their total welfare/income.