Mongolia vs Uruguay: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory
Mongolia
45.4%
in 2020
Uruguay
45.0%
in 2022
Mongolia rank
20th
Uruguay rank
21st
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Mongolia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 45.4% against 45.0% in Uruguay, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 20th and Uruguay ranks 21st of 34 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 2 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 44.4% | 40.5% | 3.9% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 46.4% | 40.5% | 5.9% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 45.4% | 45.9% | 0.5% | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory, Mongolia or Uruguay?
- Mongolia, at 45.4% against 45.0% in Uruguay as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory between Mongolia and Uruguay?
- 0.4%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Uruguay?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Uruguay rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory?
- Mongolia ranks 20th and Uruguay ranks 21st of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group