Chile vs Uruguay: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory
Chile
44.2%
in 2022
Uruguay
45.0%
in 2022
Chile rank
22nd
Uruguay rank
21st
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Chile
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 45.0% against 44.2% in Chile, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 22nd and Uruguay ranks 21st of 34 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.5% | 40.5% | 6.0% | Chile |
| 2010s | 35.7% | 47.0% | 11.3% | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 39.0% | 45.4% | 6.5% | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory, Chile or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 45.0% against 44.2% in Chile as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory between Chile and Uruguay?
- 0.8%, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Uruguay?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2022.
- How do Chile and Uruguay rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory?
- Chile ranks 22nd and Uruguay ranks 21st of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group