Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Zimbabwe

Zimbabwe: Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) was 33.91 0-100 in 2025. ▲ Rising

Latest (2025)
33.91 0-100
Change on year
down 2.6%
World rank
178th
of 208 countries
All-time high
41.22 0-100
in 1996
All-time low
26.58 0-100
in 2005
Years of data
27
1996–2025

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Zimbabwe, 1996–2025

0102030401996201020251996: 41.2 0-1001998: 37.7 0-1002000: 31.9 0-1002002: 29.2 0-1002003: 31.6 0-1002004: 27.8 0-1002005: 26.6 0-1002006: 29.4 0-1002007: 28.7 0-1002008: 27.7 0-1002009: 28.7 0-1002010: 30.4 0-1002011: 31.4 0-1002012: 30.4 0-1002013: 31.8 0-1002014: 32.8 0-1002015: 34.5 0-1002016: 32.8 0-1002017: 33.1 0-1002018: 36.2 0-1002019: 35.4 0-1002020: 36.6 0-1002021: 35.8 0-1002022: 35.7 0-1002023: 35.7 0-1002024: 34.8 0-1002025: 33.9 0-100

Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 0-100.

Analysis

In 2025, voice and accountability - governance score in Zimbabwe stood at 33.91 0-100.

The figure is down 2.6% on the previous year and down 1.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance score in Zimbabwe peaked at 41.22 0-100 in 1996 and was at its lowest, 26.58 0-100, in 2005.

Zimbabwe ranks 178th of 208 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.

Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Zimbabwe, year by year

Annual values for Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Zimbabwe, 1996 to 2025.
Year 0-100 Change
1996 41.22 0-100 —
1998 37.72 0-100 -8.5%
2000 31.87 0-100 -15.5%
2002 29.24 0-100 -8.3%
2003 31.59 0-100 +8.1%
2004 27.8 0-100 -12.0%
2005 26.58 0-100 -4.4%
2006 29.4 0-100 +10.6%
2007 28.65 0-100 -2.6%
2008 27.75 0-100 -3.1%
2009 28.74 0-100 +3.6%
2010 30.4 0-100 +5.8%
2011 31.35 0-100 +3.1%
2012 30.39 0-100 -3.1%
2013 31.83 0-100 +4.7%
2014 32.83 0-100 +3.2%
2015 34.46 0-100 +5.0%
2016 32.77 0-100 -4.9%
2017 33.1 0-100 +1.0%
2018 36.18 0-100 +9.3%
2019 35.42 0-100 -2.1%
2020 36.59 0-100 +3.3%
2021 35.84 0-100 -2.1%
2022 35.69 0-100 -0.4%
2023 35.65 0-100 -0.1%
2024 34.81 0-100 -2.4%
2025 33.91 0-100 -2.6%

Zimbabwe compared with similar countries

  • Zimbabwe's 33.91 0-100 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 44.49 0-100, 76% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
  • Zimbabwe's 33.91 0-100 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 41.18 0-100, 82% of the median. (48 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 39.47 0-100 37.72 0-100 41.22 0-100 2
2000s 29.07 0-100 26.58 0-100 31.87 0-100 9
2010s 32.87 0-100 30.39 0-100 36.18 0-100 10
2020s 35.41 0-100 33.91 0-100 36.59 0-100 6

Countries ranked near Zimbabwe

  1. 175 Ethiopia 34.31 0-100 compare
  2. 176 Congo 34.3 0-100 compare
  3. 177 Qatar 33.92 0-100 compare
  4. 179 Djibouti 33.39 0-100 compare
  5. 180 Libya 31.3 0-100 compare
  6. 181 Russia 31.29 0-100 compare

See the full ranking of 208 places →

More reference data data for Zimbabwe

All data for Zimbabwe →

Frequently asked questions

What is voice and accountability - governance score in Zimbabwe?
Voice and accountability - governance score in Zimbabwe was 33.91 0-100 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Zimbabwe?
The highest recorded value was 41.22 0-100 in 1996.
What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Zimbabwe?
The lowest recorded value was 26.58 0-100 in 2005.
How does Zimbabwe rank for voice and accountability - governance score?
Zimbabwe ranks 178th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
Is voice and accountability - governance score rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
Over the last ten years it is down 1.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Zimbabwe. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/zimbabwe/">Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Zimbabwe</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).