Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in New Zealand

New Zealand: Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) was 87.27 0-100 in 2025. ▲ Rising

Latest (2025)
87.27 0-100
Change on year
down 0.6%
World rank
5th
of 208 countries
All-time high
89.88 0-100
in 2011
All-time low
83.49 0-100
in 2002
Years of data
27
1996–2025

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in New Zealand, 1996–2025

0204060801996201020251996: 85.2 0-1001998: 84.1 0-1002000: 85.1 0-1002002: 83.5 0-1002003: 85.4 0-1002004: 84.9 0-1002005: 86.2 0-1002006: 86.3 0-1002007: 86.2 0-1002008: 87 0-1002009: 87.9 0-1002010: 88.1 0-1002011: 89.9 0-1002012: 89.6 0-1002013: 89.2 0-1002014: 88.4 0-1002015: 89.3 0-1002016: 89.2 0-1002017: 89.4 0-1002018: 88.7 0-1002019: 88.8 0-1002020: 88.6 0-1002021: 88.3 0-1002022: 88.6 0-1002023: 88.1 0-1002024: 87.8 0-1002025: 87.3 0-100

Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 0-100.

Analysis

The most recent figure for voice and accountability - governance score in New Zealand is 87.27 0-100, measured in 2025.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 0.6% on the previous year and down 2.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance score in New Zealand peaked at 89.88 0-100 in 2011 and was at its lowest, 83.49 0-100, in 2002.

That places New Zealand 5th out of 208 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top 10%.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.

Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in New Zealand, year by year

Annual values for Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in New Zealand, 1996 to 2025.
Year 0-100 Change
1996 85.2 0-100 —
1998 84.08 0-100 -1.3%
2000 85.09 0-100 +1.2%
2002 83.49 0-100 -1.9%
2003 85.39 0-100 +2.3%
2004 84.9 0-100 -0.6%
2005 86.2 0-100 +1.5%
2006 86.25 0-100 +0.1%
2007 86.17 0-100 -0.1%
2008 86.97 0-100 +0.9%
2009 87.92 0-100 +1.1%
2010 88.06 0-100 +0.2%
2011 89.88 0-100 +2.1%
2012 89.59 0-100 -0.3%
2013 89.22 0-100 -0.4%
2014 88.36 0-100 -1.0%
2015 89.32 0-100 +1.1%
2016 89.23 0-100 -0.1%
2017 89.36 0-100 +0.1%
2018 88.73 0-100 -0.7%
2019 88.84 0-100 +0.1%
2020 88.64 0-100 -0.2%
2021 88.29 0-100 -0.4%
2022 88.59 0-100 +0.3%
2023 88.07 0-100 -0.6%
2024 87.76 0-100 -0.4%
2025 87.27 0-100 -0.6%

New Zealand compared with similar countries

  • New Zealand's 87.27 0-100 is above the median for high income countries, which is 76.46 0-100, 1.1× the median. (76 countries reporting)
  • New Zealand's 87.27 0-100 is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 63.85 0-100, 1.4× the median. (36 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 84.64 0-100 84.08 0-100 85.2 0-100 2
2000s 85.82 0-100 83.49 0-100 87.92 0-100 9
2010s 89.06 0-100 88.06 0-100 89.88 0-100 10
2020s 88.1 0-100 87.27 0-100 88.64 0-100 6

Countries ranked near New Zealand

  1. 2 Denmark 90.47 0-100 compare
  2. 3 Finland 88.79 0-100 compare
  3. 4 Sweden 87.64 0-100 compare
  4. 6 Ireland 87.13 0-100 compare
  5. 7 Luxembourg 87.09 0-100 compare
  6. 8 Netherlands 86.84 0-100 compare

See the full ranking of 208 places →

More reference data data for New Zealand

All data for New Zealand →

Frequently asked questions

What is voice and accountability - governance score in New Zealand?
Voice and accountability - governance score in New Zealand was 87.27 0-100 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in New Zealand?
The highest recorded value was 89.88 0-100 in 2011.
What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in New Zealand?
The lowest recorded value was 83.49 0-100 in 2002.
How does New Zealand rank for voice and accountability - governance score?
New Zealand ranks 5th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
Is voice and accountability - governance score rising or falling in New Zealand?
Over the last ten years it is down 2.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this New Zealand data come from?
The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in New Zealand. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/new-zealand/">Voice and Accountability - Governance score in New Zealand</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).