Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Malaysia

Malaysia: Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) was 55.78 0-100 in 2025. ▲ Rising

Latest (2025)
55.78 0-100
Change on year
down 0.9%
World rank
111th
of 208 countries
All-time high
57.54 0-100
in 2019
All-time low
44.21 0-100
in 2000
Years of data
27
1996–2025

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Malaysia, 1996–2025

02040601996201020251996: 46.8 0-1001998: 45.3 0-1002000: 44.2 0-1002002: 46.9 0-1002003: 49.2 0-1002004: 48.7 0-1002005: 50.1 0-1002006: 50.6 0-1002007: 50 0-1002008: 50 0-1002009: 50.3 0-1002010: 53 0-1002011: 52.3 0-1002012: 51.3 0-1002013: 51.6 0-1002014: 51.5 0-1002015: 50 0-1002016: 49.7 0-1002017: 50.4 0-1002018: 55.4 0-1002019: 57.5 0-1002020: 55.4 0-1002021: 53.5 0-1002022: 55.3 0-1002023: 55.3 0-1002024: 56.3 0-1002025: 55.8 0-100

Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 0-100.

Analysis

The most recent figure for voice and accountability - governance score in Malaysia is 55.78 0-100, measured in 2025.

The figure is down 0.9% on the previous year and up 11.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance score in Malaysia peaked at 57.54 0-100 in 2019 and was at its lowest, 44.21 0-100, in 2000.

Malaysia ranks 111th of 208 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.

Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Malaysia, year by year

Annual values for Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Malaysia, 1996 to 2025.
Year 0-100 Change
1996 46.81 0-100 —
1998 45.3 0-100 -3.2%
2000 44.21 0-100 -2.4%
2002 46.88 0-100 +6.0%
2003 49.2 0-100 +4.9%
2004 48.67 0-100 -1.1%
2005 50.13 0-100 +3.0%
2006 50.64 0-100 +1.0%
2007 50.03 0-100 -1.2%
2008 49.99 0-100 -0.1%
2009 50.33 0-100 +0.7%
2010 52.97 0-100 +5.3%
2011 52.33 0-100 -1.2%
2012 51.33 0-100 -1.9%
2013 51.6 0-100 +0.5%
2014 51.51 0-100 -0.2%
2015 50 0-100 -2.9%
2016 49.75 0-100 -0.5%
2017 50.41 0-100 +1.3%
2018 55.38 0-100 +9.9%
2019 57.54 0-100 +3.9%
2020 55.43 0-100 -3.7%
2021 53.49 0-100 -3.5%
2022 55.32 0-100 +3.4%
2023 55.26 0-100 -0.1%
2024 56.32 0-100 +1.9%
2025 55.78 0-100 -0.9%

Malaysia compared with similar countries

  • Malaysia's 55.78 0-100 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 56.73 0-100, 98% of the median. (59 countries reporting)
  • Malaysia's 55.78 0-100 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 63.85 0-100, 87% of the median. (36 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 46.05 0-100 45.3 0-100 46.81 0-100 2
2000s 48.9 0-100 44.21 0-100 50.64 0-100 9
2010s 52.28 0-100 49.75 0-100 57.54 0-100 10
2020s 55.27 0-100 53.49 0-100 56.32 0-100 6

Countries ranked near Malaysia

  1. 108 Peru 56.73 0-100 compare
  2. 109 Ecuador 56.25 0-100 compare
  3. 110 Ukraine 56.19 0-100 compare
  4. 112 Paraguay 55.24 0-100 compare
  5. 113 India 54.93 0-100 compare
  6. 114 Indonesia 54.67 0-100 compare

See the full ranking of 208 places →

More reference data data for Malaysia

All data for Malaysia →

Frequently asked questions

What is voice and accountability - governance score in Malaysia?
Voice and accountability - governance score in Malaysia was 55.78 0-100 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Malaysia?
The highest recorded value was 57.54 0-100 in 2019.
What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Malaysia?
The lowest recorded value was 44.21 0-100 in 2000.
How does Malaysia rank for voice and accountability - governance score?
Malaysia ranks 111th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
Is voice and accountability - governance score rising or falling in Malaysia?
Over the last ten years it is up 11.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Malaysia data come from?
The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Malaysia. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/malaysia/">Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Malaysia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).