Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Kyrgyzstan

Kyrgyzstan: Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) was 42.22 0-100 in 2025. ▲ Rising

Latest (2025)
42.22 0-100
Change on year
down 2.6%
World rank
148th
of 208 countries
All-time high
55.07 0-100
in 2018
All-time low
35.01 0-100
in 2000
Years of data
27
1996–2025

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Kyrgyzstan, 1996–2025

02040601996201020251996: 41.5 0-1001998: 39.9 0-1002000: 35 0-1002002: 40.9 0-1002003: 41.2 0-1002004: 43.5 0-1002005: 44.5 0-1002006: 49.1 0-1002007: 47.7 0-1002008: 43.4 0-1002009: 43.1 0-1002010: 46.6 0-1002011: 49.1 0-1002012: 50.1 0-1002013: 52 0-1002014: 53.8 0-1002015: 54.8 0-1002016: 54.5 0-1002017: 54 0-1002018: 55.1 0-1002019: 52.9 0-1002020: 51 0-1002021: 50.1 0-1002022: 46.9 0-1002023: 45.5 0-1002024: 43.4 0-1002025: 42.2 0-100

Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 0-100.

Analysis

In 2025, voice and accountability - governance score in Kyrgyzstan stood at 42.22 0-100.

That represents a change of down 2.6% on the previous year and down 23.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance score in Kyrgyzstan peaked at 55.07 0-100 in 2018 and was at its lowest, 35.01 0-100, in 2000.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 148th of 208 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.

Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Kyrgyzstan, year by year

Annual values for Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Kyrgyzstan, 1996 to 2025.
Year 0-100 Change
1996 41.46 0-100 —
1998 39.86 0-100 -3.9%
2000 35.01 0-100 -12.2%
2002 40.92 0-100 +16.9%
2003 41.25 0-100 +0.8%
2004 43.49 0-100 +5.4%
2005 44.47 0-100 +2.2%
2006 49.12 0-100 +10.5%
2007 47.69 0-100 -2.9%
2008 43.41 0-100 -9.0%
2009 43.12 0-100 -0.7%
2010 46.63 0-100 +8.1%
2011 49.09 0-100 +5.3%
2012 50.08 0-100 +2.0%
2013 52 0-100 +3.8%
2014 53.82 0-100 +3.5%
2015 54.81 0-100 +1.9%
2016 54.46 0-100 -0.6%
2017 54 0-100 -0.8%
2018 55.07 0-100 +2.0%
2019 52.88 0-100 -4.0%
2020 51.01 0-100 -3.5%
2021 50.13 0-100 -1.7%
2022 46.86 0-100 -6.5%
2023 45.46 0-100 -3.0%
2024 43.37 0-100 -4.6%
2025 42.22 0-100 -2.6%

Kyrgyzstan compared with similar countries

  • Kyrgyzstan's 42.22 0-100 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 44.49 0-100, 95% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
  • Kyrgyzstan's 42.22 0-100 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 73.89 0-100, 57% of the median. (54 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 40.66 0-100 39.86 0-100 41.46 0-100 2
2000s 43.16 0-100 35.01 0-100 49.12 0-100 9
2010s 52.28 0-100 46.63 0-100 55.07 0-100 10
2020s 46.51 0-100 42.22 0-100 51.01 0-100 6

Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan

  1. 145 Tanzania 43.3 0-100 compare
  2. 146 Iraq 42.64 0-100 compare
  3. 147 Gabon 42.56 0-100 compare
  4. 149 Mozambique 41.18 0-100 compare
  5. 150 Mauritania 41.17 0-100 compare
  6. 151 Kuwait 40.86 0-100 compare

See the full ranking of 208 places →

More reference data data for Kyrgyzstan

All data for Kyrgyzstan →

Frequently asked questions

What is voice and accountability - governance score in Kyrgyzstan?
Voice and accountability - governance score in Kyrgyzstan was 42.22 0-100 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
The highest recorded value was 55.07 0-100 in 2018.
What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
The lowest recorded value was 35.01 0-100 in 2000.
How does Kyrgyzstan rank for voice and accountability - governance score?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 148th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
Is voice and accountability - governance score rising or falling in Kyrgyzstan?
Over the last ten years it is down 23.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Kyrgyzstan. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/kyrgyz-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/kyrgyz-republic/">Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Kyrgyzstan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).