Urban vs rural majority, per unit of GDP in Equatorial Guinea
Equatorial Guinea: Urban vs rural majority, per unit of GDP was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Urban vs rural majority, per unit of GDP in Equatorial Guinea, 1962–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
In 2025, urban vs rural majority, per unit of gdp in Equatorial Guinea stood at 0 units per US$ of GDP.
That represents a change of up 3.7% on the previous year and up 6.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, urban vs rural majority, per unit of gdp in Equatorial Guinea peaked at 0 units per US$ of GDP in 1981 and was at its lowest, 0 units per US$ of GDP, in 2008.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 55th of 211 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Urban vs rural majority, per unit of GDP in Equatorial Guinea, year by year
| Year | units per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1962 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1963 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -15.8% |
| 1964 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -14.7% |
| 1965 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -19.8% |
| 1966 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -6.3% |
| 1967 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.4% |
| 1968 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +7.1% |
| 1969 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +0.4% |
| 1970 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +1.4% |
| 1971 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +2.1% |
| 1972 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -0.7% |
| 1973 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -19.4% |
| 1974 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -13.7% |
| 1975 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -9.7% |
| 1976 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +0.6% |
| 1977 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -0.3% |
| 1980 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +105.6% |
| 1981 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +37.9% |
| 1982 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -17.0% |
| 1983 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -0.3% |
| 1984 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -10.7% |
| 1985 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -16.6% |
| 1986 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -15.2% |
| 1987 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -13.9% |
| 1988 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -2.1% |
| 1989 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +20.0% |
| 1990 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -17.4% |
| 1991 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +5.3% |
| 1992 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -15.0% |
| 1993 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +1.1% |
| 1994 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +36.0% |
| 1995 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -28.9% |
| 1996 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -39.0% |
| 1997 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -47.4% |
| 1998 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +19.3% |
| 1999 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -40.3% |
| 2000 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -40.6% |
| 2001 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -28.3% |
| 2002 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -18.4% |
| 2003 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -26.0% |
| 2004 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -42.2% |
| 2005 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -44.6% |
| 2006 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -15.4% |
| 2007 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -19.5% |
| 2008 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -30.7% |
| 2009 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +38.1% |
| 2010 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.1% |
| 2011 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -19.5% |
| 2012 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +0.6% |
| 2013 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +7.5% |
| 2014 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +6.3% |
| 2015 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +73.6% |
| 2016 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +17.8% |
| 2017 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -7.5% |
| 2018 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -6.5% |
| 2019 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +15.7% |
| 2020 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +15.3% |
| 2021 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -18.7% |
| 2022 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -10.4% |
| 2023 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +9.5% |
| 2024 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.1% |
| 2025 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +3.7% |
Equatorial Guinea compared with similar countries
- Equatorial Guinea's 0 units per US$ of GDP is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0 units per US$ of GDP, 3.6× the median. (58 countries reporting)
- Equatorial Guinea's 0 units per US$ of GDP is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0 units per US$ of GDP, 3.1× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Urban vs rural majority, per unit of GDP in Equatorial Guinea changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1980 | +105.6% | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 8 |
| 1970s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 8 |
| 1980s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 6 |
Countries ranked near Equatorial Guinea
- 52 Montenegro 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 53 Isle of Man 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 54 Sierra Leone 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 56 Maldives 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 57 Mauritania 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 58 Eswatini 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
More reference data data for Equatorial Guinea
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0013 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.007 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0083 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0083 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0042 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0044 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0316 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0402 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0358 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied 1.11 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is urban vs rural majority, per unit of gdp in Equatorial Guinea?
- Urban vs rural majority, per unit of gdp in Equatorial Guinea was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest urban vs rural majority, per unit of gdp recorded in Equatorial Guinea?
- The highest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 1981.
- What is the lowest urban vs rural majority, per unit of gdp recorded in Equatorial Guinea?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2008.
- How does Equatorial Guinea rank for urban vs rural majority, per unit of gdp?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 55th out of 211 countries with data for 2025.
- Is urban vs rural majority, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Equatorial Guinea?
- Over the last ten years it is up 6.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Equatorial Guinea data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Urban vs rural majority, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 62 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Urban vs rural majority divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Urban vs rural majority ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Do more people live in urban or rural areas? HYDE (2023); United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2025) – with minor processing by Our World in Data
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Urban vs rural majority divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.