Urban vs rural majority, per unit of GDP in Belarus
Belarus: Urban vs rural majority, per unit of GDP was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Urban vs rural majority, per unit of GDP in Belarus, 1990–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
Belarus recorded 0 units per US$ of GDP for urban vs rural majority, per unit of gdp in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 36 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 15.5% on the previous year and down 37.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, urban vs rural majority, per unit of gdp in Belarus peaked at 0 units per US$ of GDP in 1999 and was at its lowest, 0 units per US$ of GDP, in 2025.
Belarus ranks 121st of 211 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Urban vs rural majority, per unit of GDP in Belarus, year by year
| Year | units per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1991 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.7% |
| 1992 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +9.2% |
| 1993 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +4.4% |
| 1994 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +9.4% |
| 1995 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +7.3% |
| 1996 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.3% |
| 1997 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +3.1% |
| 1998 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -6.6% |
| 1999 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +26.2% |
| 2000 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.1% |
| 2001 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +3.7% |
| 2002 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -14.7% |
| 2003 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -17.6% |
| 2004 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -22.5% |
| 2005 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -23.1% |
| 2006 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -17.6% |
| 2007 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -17.8% |
| 2008 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -25.0% |
| 2009 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +20.5% |
| 2010 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -10.7% |
| 2011 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -6.7% |
| 2012 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.4% |
| 2013 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -12.5% |
| 2014 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.7% |
| 2015 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +40.1% |
| 2016 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +18.6% |
| 2017 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -12.6% |
| 2018 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -8.6% |
| 2019 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -6.5% |
| 2020 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +5.4% |
| 2021 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -11.5% |
| 2022 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.1% |
| 2023 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +2.2% |
| 2024 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -7.4% |
| 2025 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -15.5% |
Belarus compared with similar countries
- Belarus's 0 units per US$ of GDP is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0 units per US$ of GDP, 55% of the median. (58 countries reporting)
- Belarus's 0 units per US$ of GDP is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0 units per US$ of GDP, 1.5× the median. (55 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 6 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
More reference data data for Belarus
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3462 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3596 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 2.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 24.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.96 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is urban vs rural majority, per unit of gdp in Belarus?
- Urban vs rural majority, per unit of gdp in Belarus was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest urban vs rural majority, per unit of gdp recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 1999.
- What is the lowest urban vs rural majority, per unit of gdp recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025.
- How does Belarus rank for urban vs rural majority, per unit of gdp?
- Belarus ranks 121st out of 211 countries with data for 2025.
- Is urban vs rural majority, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is down 37.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Urban vs rural majority, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 36 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Urban vs rural majority divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Urban vs rural majority ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Do more people live in urban or rural areas? HYDE (2023); United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2025) – with minor processing by Our World in Data
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Urban vs rural majority divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.