Urban area long term, annual growth rate in El Salvador
El Salvador: Urban area long term, annual growth rate was 0.89 % change on previous year in 2025. ▼ Falling
Latest (2025)
0.89 % change on previous year
Change on year
down 1.5%
World rank
157th
of 202 countries
All-time high
4.39 % change on previous year
in 1994
All-time low
0.89 % change on previous year
in 2025
Years of data
75
1951–2025
Urban area long term, annual growth rate in El Salvador, 1951–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
El Salvador recorded 0.89 % change on previous year for urban area long term, annual growth rate in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 75 years on record.
The figure is down 1.5% on the previous year and down 40.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, urban area long term, annual growth rate in El Salvador peaked at 4.39 % change on previous year in 1994 and was at its lowest, 0.89 % change on previous year, in 2025.
El Salvador ranks 157th of 202 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 75 years of available data.
Urban area long term, annual growth rate in El Salvador, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1951 | 2.23 % change on previous year | — |
| 1952 | 2.45 % change on previous year | +9.7% |
| 1953 | 2.62 % change on previous year | +7.1% |
| 1954 | 2.76 % change on previous year | +5.4% |
| 1955 | 2.89 % change on previous year | +4.5% |
| 1956 | 3.02 % change on previous year | +4.4% |
| 1957 | 3.14 % change on previous year | +4.1% |
| 1958 | 3.29 % change on previous year | +4.8% |
| 1959 | 3.46 % change on previous year | +5.0% |
| 1960 | 3.63 % change on previous year | +5.0% |
| 1961 | 3.76 % change on previous year | +3.5% |
| 1962 | 3.69 % change on previous year | -1.8% |
| 1963 | 3.75 % change on previous year | +1.7% |
| 1964 | 3.75 % change on previous year | -0.1% |
| 1965 | 3.69 % change on previous year | -1.7% |
| 1966 | 3.61 % change on previous year | -2.1% |
| 1967 | 3.54 % change on previous year | -2.0% |
| 1968 | 3.47 % change on previous year | -1.9% |
| 1969 | 3.42 % change on previous year | -1.6% |
| 1970 | 3.37 % change on previous year | -1.3% |
| 1971 | 2.9 % change on previous year | -14.2% |
| 1972 | 3.89 % change on previous year | +34.4% |
| 1973 | 3.81 % change on previous year | -2.1% |
| 1974 | 3.7 % change on previous year | -2.9% |
| 1975 | 3.56 % change on previous year | -3.8% |
| 1976 | 4.09 % change on previous year | +14.8% |
| 1977 | 3.92 % change on previous year | -4.2% |
| 1978 | 3.72 % change on previous year | -4.9% |
| 1979 | 3.5 % change on previous year | -5.9% |
| 1980 | 3.28 % change on previous year | -6.5% |
| 1981 | 3.41 % change on previous year | +4.2% |
| 1982 | 3.2 % change on previous year | -6.2% |
| 1983 | 3.04 % change on previous year | -5.0% |
| 1984 | 2.95 % change on previous year | -2.9% |
| 1985 | 2.92 % change on previous year | -1.3% |
| 1986 | 2.89 % change on previous year | -0.9% |
| 1987 | 2.85 % change on previous year | -1.4% |
| 1988 | 2.87 % change on previous year | +0.6% |
| 1989 | 2.95 % change on previous year | +2.8% |
| 1990 | 3.06 % change on previous year | +4.0% |
| 1991 | 2.97 % change on previous year | -3.2% |
| 1992 | 3.07 % change on previous year | +3.5% |
| 1993 | 4.24 % change on previous year | +38.1% |
| 1994 | 4.39 % change on previous year | +3.7% |
| 1995 | 4.04 % change on previous year | -8.0% |
| 1996 | 4.37 % change on previous year | +8.1% |
| 1997 | 4.01 % change on previous year | -8.2% |
| 1998 | 3.7 % change on previous year | -7.8% |
| 1999 | 1.75 % change on previous year | -52.6% |
| 2000 | 1.6 % change on previous year | -8.7% |
| 2001 | 2.19 % change on previous year | +36.7% |
| 2002 | 2.1 % change on previous year | -4.0% |
| 2003 | 2.03 % change on previous year | -3.4% |
| 2004 | 1.98 % change on previous year | -2.5% |
| 2005 | 1.94 % change on previous year | -1.8% |
| 2006 | 1.91 % change on previous year | -1.5% |
| 2007 | 1.89 % change on previous year | -1.4% |
| 2008 | 1.87 % change on previous year | -1.1% |
| 2009 | 1.85 % change on previous year | -0.8% |
| 2010 | 1.84 % change on previous year | -0.7% |
| 2011 | 1.55 % change on previous year | -15.7% |
| 2012 | 1.53 % change on previous year | -1.0% |
| 2013 | 1.52 % change on previous year | -1.0% |
| 2014 | 1.5 % change on previous year | -1.0% |
| 2015 | 1.49 % change on previous year | -1.0% |
| 2016 | 1.47 % change on previous year | -1.1% |
| 2017 | 1.46 % change on previous year | -1.1% |
| 2018 | 1.44 % change on previous year | -1.1% |
| 2019 | 1.42 % change on previous year | -1.1% |
| 2020 | 1.41 % change on previous year | -1.1% |
| 2021 | 0.9442 % change on previous year | -32.9% |
| 2022 | 0.9305 % change on previous year | -1.4% |
| 2023 | 0.917 % change on previous year | -1.5% |
| 2024 | 0.9036 % change on previous year | -1.5% |
| 2025 | 0.89 % change on previous year | -1.5% |
El Salvador compared with similar countries
- El Salvador's 0.89 % change on previous year is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 1.66 % change on previous year, 53% of the median. (52 countries reporting)
- El Salvador's 0.89 % change on previous year is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 1.52 % change on previous year, 59% of the median. (37 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Urban area long term, annual growth rate in El Salvador changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1999 | -52.6% | 3.7 % change on previous year | 1.75 % change on previous year |
| 1993 | +38.1% | 3.07 % change on previous year | 4.24 % change on previous year |
| 2001 | +36.7% | 1.6 % change on previous year | 2.19 % change on previous year |
| 1972 | +34.4% | 2.9 % change on previous year | 3.89 % change on previous year |
| 2021 | -32.9% | 1.41 % change on previous year | 0.9442 % change on previous year |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 2.87 % change on previous year | 2.23 % change on previous year | 3.46 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 1960s | 3.63 % change on previous year | 3.42 % change on previous year | 3.76 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1970s | 3.65 % change on previous year | 2.9 % change on previous year | 4.09 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | 3.04 % change on previous year | 2.85 % change on previous year | 3.41 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 3.56 % change on previous year | 1.75 % change on previous year | 4.39 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.94 % change on previous year | 1.6 % change on previous year | 2.19 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.52 % change on previous year | 1.42 % change on previous year | 1.84 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.9987 % change on previous year | 0.89 % change on previous year | 1.41 % change on previous year | 6 |
Countries ranked near El Salvador
- 154 Russia 0.9546 % change on previous year compare
- 155 Denmark 0.9309 % change on previous year compare
- 156 Greece 0.9159 % change on previous year compare
- 158 France 0.8543 % change on previous year compare
- 159 Netherlands Antilles 0.8464 % change on previous year compare
- 160 New Zealand 0.8435 % change on previous year compare
More reference data data for El Salvador
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2714 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.6267 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0909 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.91 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.3176 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 3.5 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 8.5 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4948 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is urban area long term, annual growth rate in El Salvador?
- Urban area long term, annual growth rate in El Salvador was 0.89 % change on previous year in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest urban area long term, annual growth rate recorded in El Salvador?
- The highest recorded value was 4.39 % change on previous year in 1994.
- What is the lowest urban area long term, annual growth rate recorded in El Salvador?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.89 % change on previous year in 2025.
- How does El Salvador rank for urban area long term, annual growth rate?
- El Salvador ranks 157th out of 202 countries with data for 2025.
- Is urban area long term, annual growth rate rising or falling in El Salvador?
- Over the last ten years it is down 40.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this El Salvador data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Urban area long term, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 75 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Urban area long term. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Urban area over the long-term HYDE (2025) – with minor processing by Our World in Data
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Urban area long term. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.