Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP in Tajikistan

Tajikistan: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2014. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2014)
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
Change on year
up 363.5%
World rank
153rd
of 173 countries
All-time high
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2003
All-time low
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2013
Years of data
12
2001–2014

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP in Tajikistan, 2001–2014

00002001200720142001: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP2002: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP2003: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP2004: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP2006: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP2007: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP2008: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP2009: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP2010: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP2011: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP2013: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP2014: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in hectares per US$ of GDP.

Analysis

In 2014, tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp in Tajikistan stood at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 363.5% on the previous year and down 93.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp in Tajikistan peaked at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2003 and was at its lowest, 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, in 2013.

That places Tajikistan 153rd out of 173 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP in Tajikistan, year by year

Annual values for Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP in Tajikistan, 2001 to 2014.
Year hectares per US$ of GDP Change
2001 0 hectares per US$ of GDP —
2002 0 hectares per US$ of GDP +146.1%
2003 0 hectares per US$ of GDP +78.4%
2004 0 hectares per US$ of GDP -68.1%
2006 0 hectares per US$ of GDP +90.9%
2007 0 hectares per US$ of GDP -89.4%
2008 0 hectares per US$ of GDP +68.4%
2009 0 hectares per US$ of GDP +49.5%
2010 0 hectares per US$ of GDP -82.5%
2011 0 hectares per US$ of GDP -78.4%
2013 0 hectares per US$ of GDP -22.1%
2014 0 hectares per US$ of GDP +363.5%

Tajikistan compared with similar countries

  • Tajikistan's 0 hectares per US$ of GDP is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, 2% of the median. (43 countries reporting)
  • Tajikistan's 0 hectares per US$ of GDP is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, 9% of the median. (49 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 0 hectares per US$ of GDP 0 hectares per US$ of GDP 0 hectares per US$ of GDP 8
2010s 0 hectares per US$ of GDP 0 hectares per US$ of GDP 0 hectares per US$ of GDP 4

Countries ranked near Tajikistan

  1. 150 Kyrgyzstan 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
  2. 151 Pakistan 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
  3. 152 Kazakhstan 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
  4. 154 Lesotho 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
  5. 155 Bangladesh 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
  6. 156 Mongolia 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare

See the full ranking of 173 places →

More reference data data for Tajikistan

All data for Tajikistan →

Frequently asked questions

What is tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp in Tajikistan?
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp in Tajikistan was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2014, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp recorded in Tajikistan?
The highest recorded value was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2003.
What is the lowest tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp recorded in Tajikistan?
The lowest recorded value was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2013.
How does Tajikistan rank for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp?
Tajikistan ranks 153rd out of 173 countries with data for 2014.
Is tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Tajikistan?
Over the last ten years it is down 93.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Tajikistan data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP in Tajikistan. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-unit-of-gdp/tajikistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-unit-of-gdp/tajikistan/">Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP in Tajikistan</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Tree cover loss by dominant driver ÷ GDP (current US$)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP
Unit
hectares per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 3,890 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.