Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP in Norway
Norway: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2024. ▼ Falling
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP in Norway, 2001–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in hectares per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
Norway recorded 0 hectares per US$ of GDP for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp in 2024.
That represents a change of down 16.2% on the previous year and down 6.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp in Norway peaked at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2020 and was at its lowest, 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, in 2003.
Norway ranks 63rd of 173 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 24 years of available data.
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP in Norway, year by year
| Year | hectares per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | — |
| 2002 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +3.9% |
| 2003 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -61.7% |
| 2004 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +157.1% |
| 2005 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -41.7% |
| 2006 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +92.8% |
| 2007 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -19.5% |
| 2008 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -21.0% |
| 2009 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -3.0% |
| 2010 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +18.8% |
| 2011 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -38.3% |
| 2012 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +31.4% |
| 2013 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -23.7% |
| 2014 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -11.8% |
| 2015 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +8.0% |
| 2016 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +133.6% |
| 2017 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -6.8% |
| 2018 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -19.5% |
| 2019 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +4.3% |
| 2020 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +31.9% |
| 2021 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -43.1% |
| 2022 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -24.1% |
| 2023 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -0.7% |
| 2024 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -16.2% |
Norway compared with similar countries
- Norway's 0 hectares per US$ of GDP is above the median for high income countries, which is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, 3.2× the median. (61 countries reporting)
- Norway's 0 hectares per US$ of GDP is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, 6.2× the median. (49 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP in Norway changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | +157.1% | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near Norway
More reference data data for Norway
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.3703 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3621 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.55 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0618 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.55 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.7734 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.48 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 6.9 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3366 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp in Norway?
- Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp in Norway was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp recorded in Norway?
- The highest recorded value was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2020.
- What is the lowest tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp recorded in Norway?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2003.
- How does Norway rank for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp?
- Norway ranks 63rd out of 173 countries with data for 2024.
- Is tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Norway?
- Over the last ten years it is down 6.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Norway data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Tree cover loss by dominant driver ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Tree cover loss by dominant driver Global Forest Watch (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.