Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP in Netherlands
Netherlands: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2024. ▲ Rising
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP in Netherlands, 2001–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in hectares per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
In 2024, tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp in Netherlands stood at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.
That represents a change of down 8.7% on the previous year and up 19.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp in Netherlands peaked at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2010 and was at its lowest, 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, in 2013.
That places Netherlands 147th out of 173 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 24 years of available data.
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP in Netherlands, year by year
| Year | hectares per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | — |
| 2002 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -42.9% |
| 2003 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -19.3% |
| 2004 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +15.1% |
| 2005 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +119.3% |
| 2006 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -16.9% |
| 2007 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +18.1% |
| 2008 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -47.1% |
| 2009 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +83.9% |
| 2010 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +42.3% |
| 2011 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -63.6% |
| 2012 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +17.1% |
| 2013 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -65.0% |
| 2014 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +91.6% |
| 2015 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -27.8% |
| 2016 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +236.6% |
| 2017 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +30.6% |
| 2018 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -24.2% |
| 2019 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +26.6% |
| 2020 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -15.0% |
| 2021 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +2.1% |
| 2022 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -56.0% |
| 2023 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +12.8% |
| 2024 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -8.7% |
Netherlands compared with similar countries
- Netherlands's 0 hectares per US$ of GDP is below the median for high income countries, which is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, 11% of the median. (61 countries reporting)
- Netherlands's 0 hectares per US$ of GDP is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, 22% of the median. (49 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near Netherlands
- 144 Senegal 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 San Marino 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
- 146 Denmark 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
- 148 Luxembourg 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
- 149 Syria 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
- 150 Kyrgyzstan 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
More reference data data for Netherlands
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.5851 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.79 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1102 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.79 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 5.83 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 3.59 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.93 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 18.47 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.6002 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp in Netherlands?
- Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp in Netherlands was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp recorded in Netherlands?
- The highest recorded value was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2010.
- What is the lowest tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp recorded in Netherlands?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2013.
- How does Netherlands rank for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp?
- Netherlands ranks 147th out of 173 countries with data for 2024.
- Is tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Netherlands?
- Over the last ten years it is up 19.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Netherlands data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Tree cover loss by dominant driver ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Tree cover loss by dominant driver Global Forest Watch (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.