Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP in Namibia

Namibia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2024)
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
Change on year
down 83.4%
World rank
163rd
of 173 countries
All-time high
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2015
All-time low
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2021
Years of data
13
2003–2024

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP in Namibia, 2003–2024

0000002003201320242003: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP2005: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP2006: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP2009: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP2011: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP2012: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP2013: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP2015: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP2017: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP2021: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP2022: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP2023: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP2024: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in hectares per US$ of GDP.

Analysis

The most recent figure for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp in Namibia is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, measured in 2024.

That represents a change of down 83.4% on the previous year and up 75.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp in Namibia peaked at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2015 and was at its lowest, 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, in 2021.

That places Namibia 163rd out of 173 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP in Namibia, year by year

Annual values for Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP in Namibia, 2003 to 2024.
Year hectares per US$ of GDP Change
2003 0 hectares per US$ of GDP —
2005 0 hectares per US$ of GDP -66.0%
2006 0 hectares per US$ of GDP -10.5%
2009 0 hectares per US$ of GDP +81.2%
2011 0 hectares per US$ of GDP +42.8%
2012 0 hectares per US$ of GDP -28.3%
2013 0 hectares per US$ of GDP -63.8%
2015 0 hectares per US$ of GDP +7974.8%
2017 0 hectares per US$ of GDP -98.8%
2021 0 hectares per US$ of GDP -100.0%
2022 0 hectares per US$ of GDP —
2023 0 hectares per US$ of GDP —
2024 0 hectares per US$ of GDP -83.4%

Namibia compared with similar countries

  • Namibia's 0 hectares per US$ of GDP is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, 1% of the median. (43 countries reporting)
  • Namibia's 0 hectares per US$ of GDP is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, 0% of the median. (41 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 0 hectares per US$ of GDP 0 hectares per US$ of GDP 0 hectares per US$ of GDP 4
2010s 0 hectares per US$ of GDP 0 hectares per US$ of GDP 0 hectares per US$ of GDP 5
2020s 0 hectares per US$ of GDP 0 hectares per US$ of GDP 0 hectares per US$ of GDP 4

Countries ranked near Namibia

  1. 160 Cyprus 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
  2. 161 Malta 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
  3. 162 Egypt 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
  4. 164 Somalia 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
  5. 165 Israel 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
  6. 166 Ireland 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare

See the full ranking of 173 places →

More reference data data for Namibia

All data for Namibia →

Frequently asked questions

What is tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp in Namibia?
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp in Namibia was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp recorded in Namibia?
The highest recorded value was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2015.
What is the lowest tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp recorded in Namibia?
The lowest recorded value was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2021.
How does Namibia rank for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp?
Namibia ranks 163rd out of 173 countries with data for 2024.
Is tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Namibia?
Over the last ten years it is up 75.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Namibia data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP in Namibia. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-unit-of-gdp/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-unit-of-gdp/namibia/">Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP in Namibia</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Tree cover loss by dominant driver ÷ GDP (current US$)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP
Unit
hectares per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 3,890 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.