Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP in Iraq
Iraq: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP in Iraq, 2001–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in hectares per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp in Iraq is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, measured in 2023. That is the lowest value across all 13 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp in Iraq peaked at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2004 and was at its lowest, 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, in 2023.
Iraq ranks 169th of 173 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP in Iraq, year by year
| Year | hectares per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | — |
| 2002 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -68.7% |
| 2003 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +513.0% |
| 2004 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +12.1% |
| 2005 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -78.0% |
| 2006 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -65.8% |
| 2007 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +401.5% |
| 2008 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -54.2% |
| 2009 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +413.7% |
| 2010 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -93.2% |
| 2012 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +62.7% |
| 2013 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -94.9% |
| 2023 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -100.0% |
Iraq compared with similar countries
- Iraq's 0 hectares per US$ of GDP is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP. (50 countries reporting)
- Iraq's 0 hectares per US$ of GDP is below the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP. (13 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP in Iraq changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | +513.0% | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP |
| 2009 | +413.7% | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP |
| 2007 | +401.5% | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 3 |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 1 |
Countries ranked near Iraq
- 166 Ireland 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
- 167 Uzbekistan 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
- 168 Iran 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
- 169 Burkina Faso 0 hectares per US$ of GDP
- 169 Botswana 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
- 169 Mali 0 hectares per US$ of GDP
- 169 Chad 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
More reference data data for Iraq
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2116 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 3.19 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 7.23 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3911 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 7.23 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.7096 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.235 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 13.21 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 30.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.13 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp in Iraq?
- Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp in Iraq was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp recorded in Iraq?
- The highest recorded value was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2004.
- What is the lowest tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp recorded in Iraq?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2023.
- How does Iraq rank for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp?
- Iraq ranks 169th out of 173 countries with data for 2023.
- Is tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Iraq?
- Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Iraq data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Tree cover loss by dominant driver ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Tree cover loss by dominant driver Global Forest Watch (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.