Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP in Azerbaijan
Azerbaijan: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP in Azerbaijan, 2001–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in hectares per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp in Azerbaijan is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, measured in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 39.1% on the previous year and up 0.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp in Azerbaijan peaked at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2002 and was at its lowest, 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, in 2017.
That places Azerbaijan 134th out of 173 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP in Azerbaijan, year by year
| Year | hectares per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | — |
| 2002 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +110.4% |
| 2003 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -56.1% |
| 2004 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -48.7% |
| 2005 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +6.8% |
| 2006 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -1.0% |
| 2007 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -33.9% |
| 2008 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -7.5% |
| 2009 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -49.2% |
| 2010 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +76.4% |
| 2011 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -75.3% |
| 2012 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +104.9% |
| 2013 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -54.0% |
| 2014 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +37.5% |
| 2015 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -97.3% |
| 2016 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +267.7% |
| 2017 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -92.8% |
| 2021 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +1293.3% |
| 2022 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +330.4% |
| 2023 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +288.9% |
| 2024 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -39.1% |
Azerbaijan compared with similar countries
- Azerbaijan's 0 hectares per US$ of GDP is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, 13% of the median. (50 countries reporting)
- Azerbaijan's 0 hectares per US$ of GDP is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, 55% of the median. (49 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP in Azerbaijan changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | +1293.3% | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 8 |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 4 |
Countries ranked near Azerbaijan
More reference data data for Azerbaijan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1322 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.94 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.34 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1063 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.34 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4434 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.1605 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 9.23 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 11.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.5787 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp in Azerbaijan?
- Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp in Azerbaijan was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp recorded in Azerbaijan?
- The highest recorded value was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2002.
- What is the lowest tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp recorded in Azerbaijan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2017.
- How does Azerbaijan rank for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp?
- Azerbaijan ranks 134th out of 173 countries with data for 2024.
- Is tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Azerbaijan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 0.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Azerbaijan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Tree cover loss by dominant driver ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Tree cover loss by dominant driver Global Forest Watch (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.