Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre in South Sudan

South Sudan: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre was 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
0.0001 hectares per square kilometre
Change on year
up 69.5%
World rank
150th
of 176 countries
All-time high
0.0003 hectares per square kilometre
in 2012
All-time low
0 hectares per square kilometre
in 2019
Years of data
12
2012–2023

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre in South Sudan, 2012–2023

00002012201720232012: 0 hectares per square kilometre2013: 0 hectares per square kilometre2014: 0 hectares per square kilometre2015: 0 hectares per square kilometre2016: 0 hectares per square kilometre2017: 0 hectares per square kilometre2018: 0 hectares per square kilometre2019: 0 hectares per square kilometre2020: 0 hectares per square kilometre2021: 0 hectares per square kilometre2022: 0 hectares per square kilometre2023: 0 hectares per square kilometre

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in hectares per square kilometre.

Analysis

South Sudan recorded 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre in 2023.

That represents a change of up 69.5% on the previous year and down 32.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre in South Sudan peaked at 0.0003 hectares per square kilometre in 2012 and was at its lowest, 0 hectares per square kilometre, in 2019.

South Sudan ranks 150th of 176 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre in South Sudan, year by year

Annual values for Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre in South Sudan, 2012 to 2023.
Year hectares per square kilometre Change
2012 0.0003 hectares per square kilometre —
2013 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre -61.6%
2014 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre -23.5%
2015 0 hectares per square kilometre -77.1%
2016 0 hectares per square kilometre +8.5%
2017 0 hectares per square kilometre +4.4%
2018 0 hectares per square kilometre -41.2%
2019 0 hectares per square kilometre -30.6%
2020 0 hectares per square kilometre +28.6%
2021 0 hectares per square kilometre +56.5%
2022 0 hectares per square kilometre +143.3%
2023 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre +69.5%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre 0 hectares per square kilometre 0.0003 hectares per square kilometre 8
2020s 0 hectares per square kilometre 0 hectares per square kilometre 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre 4

Countries ranked near South Sudan

  1. 147 Armenia 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre compare
  2. 148 Benin 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre compare
  3. 149 North Korea 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre compare
  4. 151 Tunisia 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre compare
  5. 152 Gambia 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre compare
  6. 153 Algeria 0 hectares per square kilometre compare

See the full ranking of 176 places →

More reference data data for South Sudan

All data for South Sudan →

Frequently asked questions

What is tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre in South Sudan?
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre in South Sudan was 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre recorded in South Sudan?
The highest recorded value was 0.0003 hectares per square kilometre in 2012.
What is the lowest tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre recorded in South Sudan?
The lowest recorded value was 0 hectares per square kilometre in 2019.
How does South Sudan rank for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre?
South Sudan ranks 150th out of 176 countries with data for 2023.
Is tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre rising or falling in South Sudan?
Over the last ten years it is down 32.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this South Sudan data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre in South Sudan. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/south-sudan/">Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre in South Sudan</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Tree cover loss by dominant driver ÷ Land area (sq. km)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre
Unit
hectares per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
176 places, 3,776 data points, 2001–2023
Last refreshed

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.