Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre was 0 hectares per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre in Kazakhstan, 2001–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in hectares per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre in Kazakhstan is 0 hectares per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
The figure is up 267.5% on the previous year and down 30.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre in Kazakhstan peaked at 0 hectares per square kilometre in 2007 and was at its lowest, 0 hectares per square kilometre, in 2015.
That places Kazakhstan 162nd out of 176 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | hectares per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 0 hectares per square kilometre | — |
| 2002 | 0 hectares per square kilometre | +282.2% |
| 2003 | 0 hectares per square kilometre | -49.4% |
| 2004 | 0 hectares per square kilometre | -10.7% |
| 2005 | 0 hectares per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 2006 | 0 hectares per square kilometre | +91.0% |
| 2007 | 0 hectares per square kilometre | +50.7% |
| 2008 | 0 hectares per square kilometre | -71.6% |
| 2009 | 0 hectares per square kilometre | +135.8% |
| 2010 | 0 hectares per square kilometre | -50.3% |
| 2011 | 0 hectares per square kilometre | +44.9% |
| 2012 | 0 hectares per square kilometre | -23.4% |
| 2013 | 0 hectares per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 2014 | 0 hectares per square kilometre | -90.3% |
| 2015 | 0 hectares per square kilometre | -74.8% |
| 2016 | 0 hectares per square kilometre | +888.8% |
| 2017 | 0 hectares per square kilometre | -3.4% |
| 2018 | 0 hectares per square kilometre | +268.3% |
| 2019 | 0 hectares per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 2020 | 0 hectares per square kilometre | -64.6% |
| 2021 | 0 hectares per square kilometre | -29.7% |
| 2022 | 0 hectares per square kilometre | -16.0% |
| 2023 | 0 hectares per square kilometre | +267.5% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre in Kazakhstan changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | +888.8% | 0 hectares per square kilometre | 0 hectares per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per square kilometre | 0 hectares per square kilometre | 0 hectares per square kilometre | 9 |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per square kilometre | 0 hectares per square kilometre | 0 hectares per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per square kilometre | 0 hectares per square kilometre | 0 hectares per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
- 159 Syria 0 hectares per square kilometre compare
- 160 Senegal 0 hectares per square kilometre compare
- 161 Egypt 0 hectares per square kilometre compare
- 163 Lesotho 0 hectares per square kilometre compare
- 164 Tajikistan 0 hectares per square kilometre compare
- 165 Kyrgyzstan 0 hectares per square kilometre compare
More reference data data for Kazakhstan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.3 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.52 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 4.95 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.8607 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 4.95 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 4.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 10.75 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 25.76 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 4.69 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre in Kazakhstan?
- Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre in Kazakhstan was 0 hectares per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 0 hectares per square kilometre in 2007.
- What is the lowest tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 hectares per square kilometre in 2015.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre?
- Kazakhstan ranks 162nd out of 176 countries with data for 2023.
- Is tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 30.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 23 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Tree cover loss by dominant driver ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Tree cover loss by dominant driver Global Forest Watch (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.