Is trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours) rising or falling in Nigeria?

Over the last ten years it is up 78.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.

Where does this Nigeria data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) in Nigeria

Name: Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) in Nigeria
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Nigeria: Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) was 50.21 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)

50.21

Change on year

up 25.0%

World rank

157th

of 188 countries

All-time high

50.21

in 2019

All-time low

28.15

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) in Nigeria, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours) in Nigeria is 50.21, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

The figure is up 25.0% on the previous year and up 78.3% over ten years.

Nigeria ranks 157th of 188 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Countries ranked near Nigeria

155 Indonesia 55.97 compare
156 Mongolia 52.44 compare
157 Central African Republic 50.21 compare
157 Ecuador 50.21 compare
157 Gabon 50.21 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Nigeria

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.77 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 19.51 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 27 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.62 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 27 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 5.94 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 5.8 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 81.9 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 121.16 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 14.27 (2050)

All data for Nigeria →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours) in Nigeria?: Trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours) in Nigeria was 50.21 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours) recorded in Nigeria?: The highest recorded value was 50.21 in 2019.
What is the lowest trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours) recorded in Nigeria?: The lowest recorded value was 28.15 in 2014.
How does Nigeria rank for trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours)?: Nigeria ranks 157th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours) rising or falling in Nigeria?: Over the last ten years it is up 78.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Nigeria data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the time for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.