Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance in South Korea
South Korea: Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance was 100 in 2019. ▬ Flat
Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance in South Korea, 2014–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance in South Korea is 100, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
South Korea ranks 1st of 191 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance in South Korea, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 100 | — |
| 2015 | 100 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 100 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 100 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 100 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 100 | +0.0% |
South Korea compared with similar countries
- South Korea's 100 is above the median for high income countries, which is 99.76, 1.0× the median. (62 countries reporting)
- South Korea's 100 is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 81.17, 1.2× the median. (28 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near South Korea
- 1 Austria 100 compare
- 1 Belgium 100 compare
- 1 Bulgaria 100 compare
- 1 Canada 100 compare
- 1 Croatia 100 compare
- 1 Czechia 100 compare
- 1 Denmark 100 compare
- 1 Estonia 100 compare
- 1 Finland 100 compare
- 1 France 100 compare
- 1 Germany 100 compare
- 1 Greece 100 compare
- 1 Hungary 100 compare
- 1 Ireland 100 compare
- 1 Italy 100 compare
- 1 Latvia 100 compare
- 1 Lesotho 100 compare
- 1 Lithuania 100 compare
- 1 Luxembourg 100 compare
- 1 Malta 100 compare
- 1 Netherlands 100 compare
- 1 New Zealand 100 compare
- 1 Poland 100 compare
- 1 Portugal 100 compare
- 1 Romania 100 compare
- 1 Slovakia 100 compare
- 1 Slovenia 100 compare
- 1 Spain 100 compare
- 1 Sweden 100 compare
More reference data data for South Korea
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9638 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.9281 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.55 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2074 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.55 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.23 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 4.37 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 5.17 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 19.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.13 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance in South Korea?
- Trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance in South Korea was 100 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance recorded in South Korea?
- The highest recorded value was 100 in 2014.
- What is the lowest trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance recorded in South Korea?
- The lowest recorded value was 100 in 2014.
- How does South Korea rank for trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance?
- South Korea ranks 1st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance rising or falling in South Korea?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this South Korea data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the time for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.